1. 01/18/2021 - 09:00 AM
    Title Co-op Cares Receives Funding for 2021 /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/04_10_2020_CoopCaresFund.jpg?h=45932144&itok=ItS-xyIb Monday | January 11, 2021 Card Teaser An additional $250,000 has been allocated to the Co-op Cares Fund for this year. The United Power Board of Directors has allocated an additional $250,000 to the cooperative’s Co-op Cares Fund for this year. The fund was created in April 2020 as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and was designed to provide financial assistance to members who have been directly impacted, especially by illness or job loss. “We’ve seen an increase in the number of members who are struggling to make their payments because of the lasting effects of this pandemic,” said Laurie Burkhart, the cooperative’s chief financial officer. “The Co-op Cares Fund was the result of proactive measures by the cooperative to provide temporary relief to members who were unfortunately impacted in dramatic ways. The inability to make payments can be a serious burden to carry. We hope our Board’s additional allocation to the Co-op Cares Fund provides some measure of relief to our members.” The cooperative was able to finance the Co-op Cares Fund by allocating funds from unclaimed capital credits, which are capital credits that were not claimed by former United Power members after several attempts to notify them over a period of years. This past year, the Board allocated $300,000 in unclaimed credits to the Co-op Cares Fund. An initial allocation of $250,000 was made in April, and an additional $50,000 was added later in the year after it was clear more assistance was needed for impacted members. “The Co-op Cares Fund has been an important pillar in our strategy to provide support to our members during this difficult time, and complements the many other ways United Power is helping our members weather this situation,” said interim CEO Bryant Robbins in a December press release announcing the additional allocation. “Through this program, United Power has provided $550,000 in direct assistance to our members who have been financially impacted by COVID-19. We are proud to have already provided assistance to more than 1,500 members.” In addition to the Co-op Cares Fund, United Power has various means of helping members stay on top of their electric bills, including payment arrangements, extensions, prepay, budget billing and assistance from local agencies. United Power encourages members to contact Member Services so we can connect them with the most appropriate assistance program for their situation. “United Power has several ways to help members when they are having difficulty paying their electric bills,” stated Robbins. “All we are asking our members to do is pick up the phone and call us if they are having difficulty paying their bill. We can’t help you if we don’t know you are struggling.” The Co-op Cares Fund will be available for assistance through the end of 2021, or when the fund is depleted. United Power members who are impacted by the current emergency or any other situation can reach our Member Services department at 303-637-1300.
  2. 09/25/2023 - 11:16 AM
    Title Co-op Here to Stay /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/BucketTruck_Sept2023.jpg?h=45932144&itok=EnJL7rmy Monday | September 25, 2023 Card Teaser It is important that members know the upcoming power supply transition will not impact your membership with the cooperative. United Power Announced Three New Power Purchase Agreements in July United Power recently announced three new power purchase agreements in advance of its upcoming exit from its current wholesale power contract with Tri-State Generation and Transmission in May 2024. The cooperative has reviewed dozens of power supply proposals over the past several months to determine the most fiscally and socially responsible partners moving forward. Finding and securing established partners in the energy industry will not only ensure sufficient power supply is available for United Power’s growing load, but having multiple agreements also presents added flexibility for the cooperative’s power mix. United Power tried to no avail to negotiate more contract flexibility and lower costs on behalf of its members. These costs are above market value, accounting for more than 70% of the cooperative’s operating expenses. Further, the existing contract locks United Power into a restrictive generation mix and prevents it from obtaining more than 5% of its total load from locally generated sources, such as utility-scale solar farms, gas-capture facilities, or even residential rooftop solar. The cooperative’s  power purchase agreements announced in July demonstrate the freedom available by exiting its current wholesale power contract next year.  Two of the three agreements will facilitate a large portion of United Power’s expected load when the cooperative exits its current contract. The cooperative’s load is presently the largest among Colorado distribution co-ops — at more than 630 megawatts (MW) — despite serving the smallest geographic footprint. The third agreement is an innovative battery storage solution that will help mitigate costs when power demand is high — also known as peak demand.  “The energy industry is entering a period of revolutionary change,” said Mark A. Gabriel, United Power’s President and Chief Executive Officer. “We have always put our members first and will continue to do so while advancing our position as an industry-leading distribution cooperative. Leaving our restrictive wholesale power contract affords us the flexibility and freedom to keeps rates competitive, join national power markets, and attract innovative energy partners.”  As the exit date approaches, questions about the cooperative’s future have started to circulate. It is important that members know the upcoming power supply transition will not impact your membership with the cooperative. United Power will continue as your power provider. New power suppliers will allow the co-op to better serve its members, who can expect the same commitment to delivering reliable and economical electricity to local homes and businesses. Office locations in Brighton, Coal Creek, and Carbon Valley will also still provide the service and support members have come to expect.   Guzman to Provide Key Power Block United Power’s power purchase agreement with the Denver-based power supplier Guzman Energy locks in one-third of the cooperative’s power needs beginning in May 2024. The 15-year agreement features fixed wholesale power pricing that provides prearranged power supply costs and rate stability for members.  Guzman partners with cooperatives, municipalities, companies, and tribes across North America to customize energy portfolios that make economic and environmental sense. New Utility-Scale Solar Addition United Power signed a 25-year power purchase agreement to receive power from Whetstone’s Solar of Alamosa project in Southern Colorado. It will add 30 MW of renewable energy to the co-op’s diverse portfolio of generation resources beginning in 2024.  The solar farm sits atop one of the state’s highest elevation plateaus and receives some of the highest irradiance in the country. Built in 2012, project upgrades are scheduled throughout 2024 to achieve optimum power output.  Ameresco’s Largest Battery Project United Power and Ameresco will partner to connect nearly 80 MW/315 MWh of battery storage capacity throughout the cooperative’s service territory. The groundbreaking project will allow United Power to balance its load while integrating renewable resources. Batteries will be located on eight different cooperative-owned substation sites in Adams, Broomfield, and Weld counties, storing and dispatching power during heavy consumption periods. 
  3. 01/03/2020 - 11:05 AM
    Title Colorado Electric Cooperatives Ask State for Greater Local Control /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/images/RenewableEnergy2.jpg?itok=5eKC0tVy Friday | January 3, 2020 Card Teaser United Power and La Plata Electric push for lower rates and cleaner energy for customers Colorado electric cooperatives United Power and La Plata Electric Association are weighing all options to change their existing energy procurement contract with Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association (“Tri-State”). In dual November filings with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”), both cooperatives asked the state’s regulating body to exercise its authority to provide a just exit charge from its existing contract with Tri-State. Currently, both entities are required to purchase a minimum of 95% of their power from Tri-State under existing contracts that run through 2050. In addition, a recent S&P report downgraded Tri-State’s credit rating, with one of the reasons being that its Members’ retail energy rates were at least 20% higher than the statewide average. “As the largest member in the Tri-State cooperative, we have a responsibility to our 92,000 residential and commercial customers to provide them with the cleanest and most affordable energy possible,” said John Parker, Chief Executive Officer of United Power. “Our current contract with Tri-State forces us to purchase some of the dirtiest energy in Colorado, while our customers pay 20% more than what is the state average. We’ve spent 18 months trying to change this contract, and all that we have gotten from Tri-State is delays, evasions and excuses. On behalf of our customers, we will no longer accept this.” Tri-State relies heavily upon fossil fuels to provide power to its 43 cooperative members across four states, with 56% of its energy generation coming from coal, which is a significantly higher reliance on coal than other energy providers in Colorado. With the passage of HB19-1261, energy companies in Colorado must start work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and Tri-State is not well-positioned to meet these new standards.  As renewable energy production continues to drive down the price of energy, Tri-State’s continued reliance on fossil fuels is also hitting its members in the pocketbooks as well as putting the cooperatives at risk of not meeting the new clean energy standards.  “Our community should have a choice,” said Jessica Matlock, Chief Executive Officer of La Plata Electric Association. “We want to be a part of the clean energy future and can achieve this through working in our backyard, with our community. We can bring jobs and economic growth to Colorado, while also supplying carbon-free energy to the region. We are disappointed that Tri-State is not partnering with us to achieve this clean energy future together. We want input into the process and choice when it comes to a cost-effective and clean energy future, not a one size fits all approach developed without input of the affected member cooperatives.”  In response to United Power’s and La Plata Energy’s filings with the CPUC, Tri-State recently filed a motion to dismiss their complaints because they do not believe that the CPUC has jurisdiction over these matters. Instead, Tri-State claims that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has jurisdiction over their rates, even though their initial application was rejected in October for being deficient and incomplete. “Tri-State is going up against a much larger tide that they spent years refusing to confront,” said Parker. “Tri-State’s lack of urgency in addressing these matters is aimed solely at self-preservation rather than what is best for our customers.” The CPUC has set a date of January 10th to receive testimony on the matter and is expected to make a decision by early April. About United PowerUnited Power is a member-owned, not-for-profit electric cooperative delivering electricity to more than 92,000 meters at homes, businesses and farms in Colorado's north-central front range. For more information about the cooperative, visit www.unitedpower.com or follow them on social media at facebook.com/unitedpower or twitter.com/unitedpowercoop.   About La Plata Electric AssociationLa Plata Electric Association, Inc. (LPEA) is a member-owned, not-for-profit, electric distribution cooperative serving La Plata and Archuleta, with segments of Hinsdale, Mineral and San Juan counties. There are 22 cooperatives in Colorado, LPEA is the fifth largest cooperative in the state, providing safe, reliable electricity at the lowest reasonable cost to approximately 34,000 members.
  4. 05/30/2018 - 02:53 PM
    Title Coming Soon – Another Location to Serve Our Members Better /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/2017_WesternFacility_1.JPG?itok=epcTmdZC Monday | June 12, 2017 Card Teaser As a cooperative, our United Power employees always pay close attention to the needs of our members. As a cooperative, our United Power employees always pay close attention to the needs of our members. Finding ways to better serve our members is a priority at every employee level – and a goal we as a cooperative continue to strive for. Late last year, a group of employees participating in a leadership program were challenged with finding the best way to better serve our members. Their solution – the addition of another facility located in the west side of our territory. In the May United Newsline, we announced the purchase of the 130,000 square foot facility located east of I-25, just south of Highway 119. Expanding the cooperative’s footprint in our territory bubbled up from the ideas of those particular employees – who spent hours upon hours researching, discussing and working together to produce a detailed plan for the possibility of another facility. The employee team focused on the benefits of increased visibility, better member access, community outreach, shorter response time during outages and the need for more space that a building on the west side of our territory would provide. Visibility  It’s no secret Colorado’s population is on the rise – and United Power is located in the apex of that growth. Located near I-25 and other major highways including Highway 52 and Highway 119, the new facility will provide additional presence needed in an area that is experiencing major growth. A centralized presence in our plains territory will be critical in meeting the needs and demands of our members located in one of the fastest growing areas of Colorado. Member Access  As our territory grows in population, access to our offices is even more essential. Providing an additional office location in the west side of our territory will create better convenience for members living in that area. Community Outreach  Connecting with our communities we serve is a priority at United Power and one of the Seven Cooperative Principles. By growing our presence with an additional facility, we’re able to expand our outreach efforts more than ever. As the communities in our territory continue to grow, United Power will continue to be a partner and provide support for our members. Shorter Response Time  A facility in the midst of a high growth area allows United Power to safely and more efficiently respond to outages, line extension and maintenance activities. By responding from the new facility, crews will avoid 27 stoplights they normally would be faced with if responding from our Brighton headquarters. The location provides our crews with easy access to major highways: I-25, Highway 7, Highway 119, Highway 52 and Highway 66. The quicker we can respond, the quicker the lights turn on. More Company Space  Built in 2006, the Brighton headquarters was designed for 10 years of future employee growth. Since 2006, United Power has added approximately 2.5 employees per year to keep up with the demands of our growing cooperative. As the number of employees increases, it becomes harder to find space to house them. By expanding to another facility, employees will have their needs met and space freed up at our Brighton headquarters location can be used for more training and storage. United Power’s corporate headquarters will remain in Brighton. Since taking possession of the new facility on April 25th United Power is now beginning the process of designing the interior of the building, which will also incorporate input from employees. We are also in the process of acquiring an adjacent plot of undeveloped land, which would allow for additional on-site material storage and expanded parking. Capital Dollars Help Fund Purchase  Proceeds from substation transfers from United Power to Tri-State Generation and Transmission, our wholesale electricity provider, helped fund a large portion of the $8.76 million purchase of the new facility. United Power sold equipment on these substations of 115 kV or higher to TriState. The capital dollars made from the sales were redistributed to acquire the new facility. This reinvestment of capital will serve all members for years to come.
  5. 01/23/2019 - 12:35 PM
    Title Coming Soon: A New Look to Your Bill /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/08_22_2018_DemandPhaseIn_0.png?h=45932144&itok=lHFf_EBe Monday | October 1, 2018 Card Teaser In the coming months, you’ll receive a newly designed billing statement that has been streamlined and re-organized so you can find the information you need as quickly and easily as possible. We’ve incorporated feedback from members like you to provide you with an easier to read bill. In the coming months, you’ll receive a newly designed billing statement that has been streamlined and re-organized so you can find the information you need as quickly and easily as possible.  A quick glance at the new statement will allow you to easily see how much energy you used, the total amount due and the payment due date. The new design also includes more information about your energy use and consumption history, and more information relevant to members taking advantage of rebates, billing programs and those with net-metered service locations. More information about how to read the new bill will be included in your first statement with the new look. Watch your mailbox or your SmartHub statement alerts for your new United Power billing statement.   
  6. 01/22/2019 - 03:25 PM
    Title Coming Soon: New Demand Rate on Billing Statements /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/July2018_NL_DemandComing.png?itok=gie9FG7S Monday | July 2, 2018 Card Teaser Beginning this fall, United Power residential members will begin to see a new line of information on their bill – the ‘Demand Charge.’ Beginning this fall, United Power residential members will begin to see a new line of information on their bill – the ‘Demand Charge.’  For the remainder of 2018, members will see a number of kW multiplied by a zero dollar amount.  This number represents the highest level of ‘demand’ that your electric consumption creates on our system, and there is currently no cost assigned to that demand.   While it is simply a way for you to begin understanding how you impact the electric grid today, it will eventually become a way for members to  control and impact their own electric bills in the coming years. What’s in your rate? Today your rate incorporates many different costs – the cost of fuels to generate electricity, the cost to deliver the energy to your home, the cost to the electric cooperative to maintain and repair the system, even the cost of billing is included in the rates you pay. Residential members have been paying a blended bill for a long time, because most members use power in a very similar way. However, we now have access to more information about how individual members use power. We have information about every member’s energy consumption in 15 minute increments, and we can actually determine how individual households are impacting our system. This additional information allows us to break apart the various components of your electric bill and charge you more precisely for the two largest components of your bill: your impact on the electric system, or your ‘demand’ on the system, and amount of power you consume – your energy use.  So, what is ‘demand’? The demand charge that United Power will show on your bill is the highest amount of electricity used during a 15 minute period in that billing month.  Here’s a simple demonstration: Both Mary and Joe use the same amount of energy, but Joe’s demand is higher since he is using his appliances simultaneously. Mary has a lower demand because she’s staggering the use of her appliances.   It costs more for the cooperative to serve Joe’s home than it does to serve Mary’s because we need to have the ability to produce and deliver the energy for both appliances at the same time.  We may have to plan to have additional electric generation plants or increase system resources to meet Joe’s higher demand and that comes at a cost to the entire co-op.  Under the new demand rate, if Joe continues to use power the same way his bill will be higher than in the past and Mary will see a savings. While these changes tend to be small for most households, the new rate structure will more closely represent the actual cost to provide that power. Now is the time to study the demand number printed on your bill and determine how you impact our electric system. In 2019, our members will begin to see a cost attached to the demand portion of the bill, and a corresponding reduction in the cost of energy. While this new rate structure will provide a fairer bill for each of our members, it’s important that you understand how your behavior affects your demand. To help you understand demand, we will be providing a series of articles in upcoming issues of United Newsline and on our website.
  7. 12/04/2020 - 03:46 PM
    Title Commitment to the Virtual Community /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/Nov2020_NL_FairsCommunity.jpg?itok=algtZaFM Tuesday | November 24, 2020 Card Teaser Reaching members via virtual format isn't a new concept, but until this year it has never been the preferred method for encouraging community participation. The cooperative often supported communities as they navigated this transition. United Power was forced to shift gears while planning its annual meeting in March as heightened concerns over the rapidly spreading COVID-19 pandemic forced the closure of the Riverdale Regional Park & Fairgrounds and many other local businesses. While many maintained hopeful expectations that the pandemic would begin to play itself out as summer weather faded, a third wave has instead continued the halt to in-person community activities and organizational fundraisers. Reaching members via virtual format is hardly a new concept, but until this year it has never been the preferred method for encouraging community members to participate with one another. For United Power, that meant turning around months of planning to offer members a virtual annual meeting that still drew their interest and encouraged participation. The cooperative wasn’t alone in navigating this journey, and often supported others holding similar events. Joining the Virtual Classroom United Power electrical engineer Tyler Bain joined a Brighton High School engineering class in September via Zoom live from one of the cooperative’s substations to talk about where electricity comes from, how it is generated and what kind of schooling it takes to become an electrical engineer. He also discussed renewable energy with the students. Decorating Virtual Ducks United Power has long participated in and supported the annual Duck Derby hosted by the Rotary Club of Northglenn-Thornton. The duck race helps raise money for the Rotary Club to support scholarships, food banks and other local projects. This year, due to COVID-19, the club hosted its first virtual Duck Derby with an online “Best Dressed Duck” contest, which United Power entered, of course. Although our authentic, one-of-a-kind cow duck did not win, we are still proud to be a supporter of all the work the Rotary Club does. Scarecrows in Fort Lupton Thinking creatively for ways to entertain and engage businesses and residents this Halloween season while maintaining safe social distancing, the City of Fort Lupton and Fort Lupton Chamber of Commerce sponsored a unique scarecrow contest throughout the community. United Power introduced the first-ever lineman made of hay into the contest. Early thoughts on the new lineman include the suggestion that he stay clear of energized line. Assisting the Career Path Each year, the Adams County Education Consortium hosts its career expo for middle school students. This year’s virtual event will feature 2-hour sessions over the course of two days in late November where students can learn more about potential career paths. United Power will both sponsor and participate in the annual event in its new first-ever virtual event.
  8. 07/29/2022 - 04:33 PM
    Title Congratulations to Fair Giveaway Winners /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/hero_images/Hero_Fair.jpg?itok=OeF7jf5h Friday | July 29, 2022 Card Teaser Thank you to everyone who entered this year. We hope to see you all at the fair. CONGRATULATIONS to the winners of United Power's 2022 Adams County Fair Ticket Package Giveaway! Lauren Cordova, Commerce City Terry Hall, Hudson Tammy Archuleta, Henderson Erik Swanson, Thornton Thank you to everyone who entered this year. We hope to see you all at the fair. #FaireverFun #UnitedPowerPride
  9. 01/22/2019 - 09:25 AM
    Title Connect with Your Co-op at our 2018 Annual Meeting /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/Mar2018_NL_ConnectCoop.png?itok=0gexV-WU Thursday | March 1, 2018 Card Teaser It’s time for United Power’s Annual Meeting, and all members are invited to attend. The Annual Meeting and Election are on Wednesday, April 18, 2018. It’s time for United Power’s Annual Meeting, and all members are invited to attend. As a member, you aren’t just a customer receiving electricity from a utility, you’re an owner of a not-for-profit organization – and you have a say in the operation. During the Annual Meeting on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 you can connect with your cooperative, enjoy the company of your fellow cooperative members and have the chance to win one of several door prizes. The 2018 Annual Meeting will be held at the Adams County Fairgrounds/Regional Park located at 9755 Henderson Road, Brighton, CO 80601.  The Director Election will be conducted differently this year. Only the four incumbent directors whose seats were up for election this year have submitted petitions indicating their interest in retaining their positions for another term. Due to the lack of challengers for these positions, the United Power Board made a decision to cancel the distribution of mail ballots, and will instead hold balloting among those members in attendance at the annual meeting. This simplified process will result in a substantial cost savings for the membership.  Member registration will be open from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m., and those who register for the meeting will be issued a ballot and be able to cast their votes for the Director election. After members have cast their ballot, they can enjoy a barbecue dinner with us, visit the educational exhibit booths and be entertained by musician Dave Connelly. The official business meeting of the members will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will include reports from the President of the Board and the Board Treasurer, and a cooperative update from Chief Executive Officer John Parker. Election results will be announced prior to adjournment and door prize drawings will conclude the meeting. To learn more about the Annual Meeting, or the candidates running for a seat on the cooperative’s board of directors, keep reading this issue, or visit www.unitedpower.com.
  10. 05/30/2018 - 03:38 PM
    Title Connect with Your Co-op at our 2018 Annual Meeting /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/2018_02_27_ConnectWithYourCoop.jpg?itok=OyxG5hps Tuesday | February 27, 2018 Card Teaser It’s time for United Power’s Annual Meeting, and all members are invited to attend. Ballots will not be mailed to members this year; in-person ballots will be cast at the annual meeting on April 18, 2018 It’s time for United Power’s Annual Meeting, and all members are invited to attend. As a member, you aren’t just a customer receiving electricity from a utility, you’re an owner of a not-for-profit organization – and you have a say in the operation. During the Annual Meeting on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 you can connect with your cooperative, enjoy the company of your fellow cooperative members and have the chance to win one of several door prizes. The 2018 Annual Meeting will be held at the Adams County Fairgrounds/Regional Park located at 9755 Henderson Road, Brighton, CO 80601. The Director Election will be conducted differently this year. Only the four incumbent directors whose seats were up for election this year have submitted petitions indicating their interest in retaining their positions for another term. Due to the lack of challengers for these positions, the United Power Board made a decision to cancel the distribution of mail ballots, and will instead hold balloting among those members in attendance at the annual meeting. This simplified process will result in a substantial cost savings for the membership. Profiles of the 2018 candidates are included in the March issue of the United Newsline, and we will also be holding four “Meet the Candidates” forums in March. Member registration will be open from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m., and those who register for the meeting will be issued a ballot and be able to cast their votes for the Director election. After members have cast their ballot, they can enjoy a barbecue dinner with us, visit the educational exhibit booths and be entertained by musician Dave Connelly. The official business meeting of the members will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will include reports from the President of the Board and the Board Treasurer, and a cooperative update from Chief Executive Officer John Parker. Election results will be announced prior to adjournment and door prize drawings will conclude the meeting. To learn more about the Annual Meeting, or the candidates running for a seat on the cooperative’s board of directors, keep reading this issue, or visit www.unitedpower.com.
  11. 03/24/2021 - 02:33 PM
    Title Connect with Your Cooperative Virtually at this Year’s Annual Meeting /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/MarApr2021_AnnualMeeting.jpg?itok=a8uX5Mtl Monday | March 8, 2021 Card Teaser This year, we are moving forward with the second consecutive virtual format that will allow members to follow along by telephone or via livestream on the cooperative’s website from the comfort of their own homes. Annual Meeting Register for the Meeting Candidate Statements With the pandemic lingering into this year, United Power is gearing up for its 2021 Annual Meeting & Director Election a little differently. The cooperative had planned to hold its previous Annual Meeting in-person before COVID. The pandemic forced the cooperative to consider alternate options for members. The result was the first-ever virtual meeting. This year, we are moving forward with the second consecutive virtual format that will allow members to follow along by telephone or via livestream on the cooperative’s website from the comfort of their own homes. All members are invited to attend the Annual Meeting to hear from United Power leadership about the exciting ways the cooperative has continued to serve members through tumultuous times over the previous year. From the cooperative’s proactive response to the pandemic to its dedicated efforts to pursue competitive rates for members, our leadership has much to share. Members who attend will have the opportunity to win one of several door prizes, announced the following day. In addition to the Annual Meeting, members have the unique opportunity to have a say in the future of their electric cooperative by voting in the director election. Each year, your votes determine who represents members on United Power’s Board of Directors. Your participation in the election is critical to helping the cooperative better serve you. Seven candidates will be running for election to the Board of Directors. This year, one seat in each director district is up for election. The director candidates are Steve Douglas and Tim Erickson in the East District; Stephen Whiteside in the Mountain District; Brad Case and Ken Kreutzer in the South District; and Vicki Hutchinson and Brian McCormick in the West District. (Candidate statements can be found here.) The cooperative mails out director ballots – including candidate statements – in late March and encourages all members to vote and mail in their ballots prior to the deadline. This year there will be no ballot drop boxes and no in-person balloting. Please return your ballots in the postage-paid envelope before the April 14 deadline. Although directors live in specific geographic districts, they represent all members and are therefore elected on an “at-large” basis. This means members should cast a vote for a director in each district and not just their own. Attending the Meeting Member registration for the Annual Meeting is now open on the cooperative’s website. Members who register will receive a phone call from the cooperative on Wednesday, April 14 at 6:30 p.m. Election results will be announced prior to adjournment. To learn more about the Annual Meeting, read about candidates running for a seat on the board, or to register, visit the Annual Meeting page. 
  12. 04/30/2019 - 09:16 AM
    Title Connected for 80 Years /sites/default/files/styles/news_card_553x430_/public/news/04_26_2019_Connected80Years.png?itok=KIk98KX1 Friday | April 26, 2019 Card Teaser As we reflect on our own 80-year history as a rural cooperative, walk with us through the history of the region, and some of the highlights of the communities we’re connected to. Our history is a story about you— the members and communities that make up this cooperative. United Power was founded in 1938 to provide electric service to Colorado’s growing northern front range. Today, the service area isn’t the sparse, rural territory that farmers rallied together to energize. It’s a mix of historic farmlands, growing metropolitan suburbs and new commercial and industrial development, intersected by some of the Denver area’s busiest transportation corridors. Within this growing service area are nearly twenty distinct towns and cities receiving all, or some, of their electricity from United Power. While United Power’s story began in 1938, many of our member communities were taking shape long before this co-op electrified the landscape. The early years for many of these communities laid the foundation for their futures. From the early beginnings when the gold rush brought people west to settle near Denver, to the surge of people who supported Colorado’s expansion through farming, coal mining and post-war development, each community we serve has a different story to tell. Along the way, United Power became a part of that story by bringing local residents and businesses the electricity that would power their next 80 years, and beyond. As we reflect on our own 80-year history as a rural cooperative, walk with us through the history of the region, and some of the highlights of the communities we’re connected to. Our history is a story about you— the members and communities that make up this cooperative. Gateway to the Gold Rush A few short years after United Power lines started delivering power along the Front Range, it began the long process of developing and building an electrical infrastructure to serve the Coal Creek and Golden Gate canyons for the first time. In serving these two canyons, the cooperative also inherited a large piece of state and American history, one that helped lead to the initial surge in population growth along the illustrious Front Range. When town promoters, storekeepers and farmers began to spin stories of gold in the western part of the Kansas territory in the mid-1850s, many suspected the claim to be a hoax. John Gregory, upon hearing the story of gold discovered in Cherry Creek, started on a prospecting tour from Ft. Laramie. In the summer of 1859, Gregory discovered an odd colored rock – burnt orange quartz – often associated with gold. He used his discovery to convince a group of men to follow him up the mountains picking for gold. In May of that year, two days after beginning his trek up the mountains, Gregory and his team found what they were looking for, putting an end to the charges that the goldfields were a hoax. The gold rush was on. Tom Golden arrived around the same time. Although he came to pan for gold near Clear Creek, he stayed to promote a new town – Arapahoe City. When news spread of Gregory’s discovery, Golden laid out a second town at the base of his trail. He called the new town Gate City, but travelers would call it Golden’s Gate City. Golden’s new town was not to be confused with the present day City of Golden, however. It was founded later as Golden City and advertised a bigger and better supply town, which proved to be true. “City” was dropped from the name in 1871. The gold Gregory discovered yielded $20 million dollars, and the district bearing his name would yield more than $220 million dollars. Instead of being around to see it, though, Gregory faded out of the scene. In 1862, he sold his mine for $21,000 and disappeared. The influx of people brought by the news of gold later led to the founding of the Colorado Territory, but Gregory’s name would go largely unrecognized. “For saving the Pike’s Peak gold rush from collapse and making bonanza kings out of greenhorn miners, Gregory got his name on a mining district in a crooked, two-mile-long gulch fouled by mine dumps,” Charlie and Mary Ramstetter recounted in their book commemorating the region’s history. The canyon Tom Golden’s new city fed into eventually became the region now known as Golden Gate Canyon. Golden Gate provided the most direct route to Gregory’s goldfields. Later, Coal Creek Canyon was also trekked as a path to the goldfields. Not far from Golden, another city was taking shape along the South Platte River where gold deposits had first been discovered. Established as a gold mining town in 1858, it quickly transformed into a supply hub for new mines. The rapid influx of people hoping to find riches in the gold mines created a city destined to become the burgeoning metropolis it is today. The founders named it after then Kansas Territory governor, James W. Denver. By the time United Power began providing power to the two canyons, the goldfields had already played out, leaving behind a lasting legacy and stories of American ingenuity. Gone, but not forgotten, people will always be fascinated by the stories of hardworking men and women seeking riches in the gold rushes of American history. The glory may have faded, the tales never will. Princeton of the Plains When Denver was founded in late 1858, much of the land surrounding it remained unsettled. As the city grew, families began looking outward for land to call their own. Pleasant DeSpain probably didn’t envision the sprawling suburbs and open spaces existing today when he homesteaded 170 acres north of Denver in 1870. Before the postwar boom in the 1950s, only a few thousand residents lived in these new cities, but today they are home to hundreds of thousands. The first of those communities was Westminster.Like many other towns before it, Westminster quickly attracted a railroad, and the area known as DeSpain Junction grew into a small farming community. Shortly after in 1885, an out of state developer named C.J. Harris arrived, purchasing land from tax-burdened settlers and dividing it into small farm tracts – creating the community of Harris.The announcement of Westminster University in 1891, planned for the former Harris property, expected to change the slow growth experienced in the town’s early years. Unfortunately, construction was delayed until 1903 when an anonymous donor provided $100,000 stipulating the school be patterned after Princeton, the prestigious east coast university in New Jersey. Five years later, classes opened with 60 enrolled students. To promote the university, officials sold off parts of the land as home sites, and were able to quickly pay off debts.As the town grew around the increasingly successful university, the need for an adequate water system grew, as well. In 1911, residents voted to incorporate as the Town of Westminster. The early success of the university was short lived, however. A board decision to make it an all-male college in 1915 ended with shuttered doors two years later when the United States entered World War I. Many students left school to serve in the military. Following the war, Belleview College was established on the grounds of the former university as a junior college and seminary.Without the university, Westminster experienced little growth until a group of Boulder businessmen decided to begin construction on a turnpike connecting Boulder and the Valley Highway (later Interstate 25), passing through both Westminster and Broomfield. Completed in 1952, more than 7,000 people traversed the highway each day. Within a few years, traffic had doubled, contributing greatly to Westminster’s growth. The end of the World War II also impacted Westminster’s population growth. Veterans moving back home following the war’s end needed a place to live, and north Denver was an attractive option for many. By 1960, the city’s population grew to more than 14,000 and several other cities had begun to spring up around it, including Thornton, Northglenn and Broomfield.Today, more than 100,000 people call Westminster home thanks to its relative location to Denver and convenient access to the Front Range. As the city has grown, so too have its ambitions to develop a welcoming community to new families with plenty of community events and open space to enjoy. Housing Along the Valley Highway While Westminster was busy growing to the west of the Valley Highway, later renovated and renamed Interstate 25, Thornton sprung up on the east side to accommodate the rapid growth of the area, due in part to an influx of World War II veterans to the area who needed a place to settle down and call home. In 1953, Sam Hoffman recognized the potential for development east of Westminster and Broomfield, which were still experiencing growth brought on by the completion of the Denver-Boulder Turnpike. Hoffman bought a section of empty farmland seven miles north of Denver and announced his intention to build a new city. He named his new city after Colorado’s then governor Danial Thornton, and set out to build houses in the newly christened town of Thornton. Like the city itself, many of the early streets in Denver’s newest suburb were named after prominent people, including the farmers who previously owned the land he was building on. When it was completed, Thornton was Adams County’s first totally planned city and first to offer complete municipal services, including water, sewage, recreation facilities, and fire and ambulance services. In just two years, Thornton grew to more than 6,000 residents, and was incorporated in 1956. It wasn’t long until others began to realize the potential of the area. Just north of Thornton, Perl Mack Homes set out to build the totally new community of Northglenn. Although Northglenn received numerous awards for being a well-planned community, it still faced the threat of annexation by Thornton, which was on its way to becoming the county’s largest city. In 1969, Northglenn joined Westminster and Thornton as incorporated cities vying for territory along the I-25 corridor north of Denver. By 1971, Thornton and Westminster had annexed land encircling Northglenn, and the battle shifted from territory to water. This new battle led to numerous legal battles and disagreements throughout the 1970s. The three cities finally reached a historic four-way agreement with Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company (FRICO) in 1979. The landmark agreement signaled cooperation between agricultural and municipal interests, and ended a decade long battle over water rights. Although the three cities share similar growth stories, each had a unique beginning. Today they continue to grow together and nearly 300,000 people call one of them home. City & County As One In 1885, while C.J. Harris was busy laying the foundations of a community that would later become Westminster, philanthropist and entrepreneur Adolph Zang was doing the same in present day Broomfield. Zang purchased 4,000 acres of land northwest of Harris’ community along a railroad spur later named Zang’s Spur. There he would establish his Elmwood Stock Farm and pursue his passion of breeding pureblood Percheron horses. The spur had been used to deliver locally grown grains to the Zang Brewing Co. in Denver, one of the largest breweries in the country at the time. In the late 1800s, the first railroad lines were built through the area. By the turn of the century, it was possible for a passenger to board a train in Broomfield and travel to almost any point in the United States, Mexico or Canada. In 1904, the Denver & Interurban railway was formed, able to take passengers throughout the northwestern part of the Front Range along its Main Line. Soon Broomfield had 19 passenger trains coming through town each day. The success of the railway was short lived however, as automotive transportation became more readily available. Denver & Interurban Railway ceased operation in 1926, and passenger trains faded out of use. For the next several decades, Broomfield survived as a small community with a handful of shops and factories, but mostly relied on farmlands. By the time World War II ended in 1945, only about 100 families lived on farmland in the area. In 1950, construction on the Denver-Boulder Turnpike began, reshaping the communities between. While Westminster saw rapid growth for its location in relation to Denver, Broomfield also saw quick growth after the turnpike’s completion, and within a few years the small farming community had evolved into a small city of 6,000. Part of that growth can be attributed to the city’s master plan developed when Turnpike Land Company purchased land in the area in 1955, reimagining it as a “dream city.” In 1961, the residents voted to incorporate, naming the new city after the abundant broomcorn that grew in the area. The city made state history in the late parts of the 1990s when it annexed land pushing it into parts of four different counties: Weld, Jefferson, Adams and Boulder. This created problems accessing services, prompting the residents to create the City and County of Broomfield. The new county officially took effect in 2001. Today, Broomfield has outgrown the original 4,000 acres Zang purchased in 1885 and encompasses more than 30 square miles. It has become a location that attracts large commercial and industrial operations, like Flatiron Crossing. The master plan, developed by the city’s founders more than 60 years ago, still governs the city today. Spacious Living As a cooperative, United Power serves at least part of nearly 20 different communities across Colorado’s Front Range and two mountain canyons. While all have a unique story to tell, perhaps few are more unique the town of Lochbuie, located along Interstate 76 just northeast of Brighton. Some might even call its story quirky. When Bim and Art Eppinger purchased the small plot of land that is now downtown Lochbuie in 1960, their plan was simple. Across Colorado, mobile home owners were paying high rents for small plots of land to live on. The Eppingers’ plan would divide the purchased land into lots and sell it to would-be residents as their own property. With 500 initial lots available, the Eppingers already had a name for their innovative city – Spacious Living, which eventually became Space City. Within only a few years, nearly every lot would be spoken for. In the early years of the town, there was no water, sewer or electricity. To get electricity, residents had to plug into a single pole shared by other residents, and water had to be carried in from a singular well. In 1963, Public Service Company of Colorado (now Xcel Energy) piped in natural gas lines. The town incorporated in 1974 to address its growing sewer problem. Early residents each owned their own septic tanks, which were eventually condemned for being too close together. In order to receive government funding to build a sewage system, the town needed to be incorporated. Around that time, Bim Eppinger sold out of his share and the town was officially renamed Lochbuie, after a town by a similar name in Scotland. Despite its quirky and innovative beginnings, Lochbuie has grown quickly. In the 1980s, the town added the subdivisions Lochwood and Lochwood Farms more than doubling the town’s size. Today, more than 6,000 people live in Lochbuie. Preserving an Agricultural Heritage Separating the growing city of Brighton from the traffic jammed roads and towering buildings of downtown Denver is an open space buffer consisting mainly of historic farmlands. The farmlands, some once slotted for development, remain today due in large to a joint effort by the City of Brighton and Adams County to preserve the city’s proud agricultural heritage. Many years ago, long existing farms in the Brighton area were responsible for growing much of the produce sold at Denver-area markets – from local farmers markets to brick and mortar stores like Safeway and King Soopers. During its height, trains would transport Brighton-grown produce across the country. By the time the Hughes Station railroad arrived in 1871, Brighton was already an established farming community. The area’s first irrigation ditch, Brantner Ditch, was filed for in 1860. Its second, the Fulton Ditch, was dug just five years later. The crop of the time, sugar beets, drove agricultural-based industrialization across Colorado. At one time, more than a dozen processing plants existed in the state. In the early 1900s, Brighton and Great Western Sugar Company agreed to build a plant outside of town. When the plant opened in 1917, it became the company’s showcase operation, largely as a result of its proximity to Denver and the railroad. Sugar beet farming was a labor intensive process, and when the plant closed in the late 1970s, many laborers found themselves unemployed. Although Amalgamated Sugar Company purchased the factory in 1985, it did not process sugar and left many buildings vacant. The loss of the plant signaled a change in local crop production to less labor intensive crops. Farmers also led the effort to recruit new industry that would provide employment opportunities to laborers between harvests. In 1995, Denver opened Denver International Airport on a parcel of land northeast of downtown. Now more accessible, the more affordable communities of Brighton and north Commerce City became attractive locations for new families. Since 2000, Brighton’s population has nearly doubled, bolstered by the expansion of E-470, Denver’s intercity toll road, just south of Brighton. As growth continued, developers offered a premium for lands previously reserved for farming. For many, it became more lucrative to sell and retire than continue operating. Hundreds of acres of lush farmland were quickly converted to housing and commercial development, pushing them to buy or lease land farther north toward Greeley. Fearing the loss of its identity as an agricultural community, the City of Brighton and Adams County stepped in. What began as the purchase and lease of hundreds of acres of farmland eventually resulted in The District Plan. The District Plan not only seeks to ensure historic farmlands are preserved, but also enrich the city’s image as a commerce center for agriculture and support agritourism near the communities served. Most small and growing communities surrounding major metropolitan areas once had roots in agriculture, but many have embraced the rapid growth and development that comes with a location near such cities. Rather than settle for the loss of productive farmland and its link to an agricultural heritage, Brighton, located just 20 miles from downtown Denver, instead chose to fight to preserve that identity. Keeping a Long Tradition Alive While residential and commercial development threatened Brighton farmland, Fort Lupton, a small community between Brighton and Greeley, faced a different industrial encroachment – gravel mining. Fort Lupton’s location near the South Platte River and several major highways made it an attractive location for industrial gravel mining. As gravel mining chipped away at available farmland, Fort Lupton shifted from a small farming town to a bedroom community for those looking for the quiet solitude of a small city with relative access to the benefits of living near a major city. The original story of Fort Lupton, however, is one traced by the evolution of its famous festival at the end of each summer, currently called Trapper Days. The current festival is a patchwork of the various elements that celebrate the town’s rich history dating back nearly 200 years to the founding of Fort Lancaster in the early 1800s, named for its builder, Lancaster Lupton. While the name is reminiscent of the town’s early history as a trading post for animal skins with other trappers and local Indian tribes, the festival actually began much later as something entirely different. Originally named Tomato Days, the festival was put on by O.E. Frinks, owner of a local cannery, at the end of each summer to celebrate the conclusion of the tomato harvest. His cannery employed many in the town and surrounding area. When the cannery shut down, the festival continued under a new name – Pioneer Days. Pioneer Days later changed to Rendezvous Days before eventually settling on Trapper Days, which has been celebrated for more than 40 years. Each year Fort Lupton attracts thousands of visitors to its three-day festival celebrating the city’s early pioneers while educating them about its proud history. Lupton’s fort was only in service for a few years and sat vacant for many more before the early settlers of Fort Lupton arrived in the late 1800s. Those early years of settlement were quite difficult, and the fort provided a safety net. “In later years of the original fort’s history, it became a rest stop for travelers and a safe place from Indian raids,” said DebraRay Thompson, director of the Fort Lupton City Museum. “Many early travelers came to know the place as Eden.” Those settlers who stayed at the fort were able to craft a grand vision, for the time, into a reality. Wanting to attract a railroad, W.G. Winborn platted the historic downtown a short distance from the fort and nearby river. It became a lively downtown, and many of those early structures still exist today, a dedication to and reminder of the hard work put into the city by its founders. Intersection of Change In the mid-1800s, Central Pacific and Union Pacific raced to build the country’s first transcontinental railroad. As this large scale undertaking was being completed, railroads quickly became the primary form of transportation. Minor railroad companies sprouted up to compete with the larger ones, and spurs were built connecting major population and supply hubs, like Denver, Cheyenne and Chicago. Steam engines used at the time were unable to carry enough water or coal to make these long treks without frequently stopping to refuel. To solve this problem, water stops were built every 10-20 miles where engines could pick up new fuel loads. Many of those former stops exist today as small towns peppered across the country along old railroad lines. Hudson is one of these towns. The early railroads were granted a lengthy right of way as they built across the plains, and were also awarded grants from the federal government to purchase land. In 1863, a section house and depot were built in present day Hudson along the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy line. A couple years later, the railroad returned to the promising area to dig a well that could pipe water directly into the cistern used for refueling. In 1887, the railroad sold the land to Hudson Land & Improvement, which envisioned something grand for the area. The company marketed the new town as a booming young city full of “promise and enterprise,” with a layout much larger than the actual plot of purchased land. This vision for the town never came to fruition. For many years throughout the early 1900s, the railroad was Hudson’s lifeblood. The railroad’s frequent stops in Hudson for refueling also allowed it to bring in supplies necessary to keep the town up and running, including lumber and coal. As a town on the plains far from the closest major city and dependent on the railroad, many settlers turned to farming. Early farmers relied on dry land farming because the area lacked sufficient water resources until the completion of the Henrylyn Irrigation District in 1923, which provided water to Hudson, Keenesburg and parts of Prospect Valley. The successful completion of the district attracted numerous farmers from other parts of the plains as the area began to produce some of the state’s best crops. Although evolutions in transportation have shifted away from railroads as a primary form of transportation, Hudson remains an active participant in the industry. The Hudson Terminal Railroad sits on 85 acres of land and incorporates nearly 12 miles of track to store and load up to 400 railcars. Sitting at the crossroads of two highways, the town has become a convenient and accessible community for travelers, and the productive farmland has kept many residents in the area for generations. Securing a Century In the fall of 1958, nearly 200 people gathered in the Keenesburg school auditorium not to decide the future of the town, but of a road that could make or break it. A twenty-mile stretch of road from Hudson to Roggen on the renovated U.S. Highway 6 that would eventually become Interstate 76 was under debate. It has been described as the most important meeting in town history. Like many small towns along the plains in Colorado, the Town of Keenesburg was originally platted as a train depot. As transportation moved away from trains, however, rural communities became more reliant on highways. The only major highway with convenient access to Keenesburg was an extension of U.S. Highway 6, allowing local businesses to sprout up along it and serve travelers. New legislation passed in 1956 targeted U.S. Highway 6 for conversion into an interstate highway. Although the state had promised to route the new highway as closely to town as possible, the proposed route ultimately ran nearly two miles north. Fearing the new route could threaten the town’s long-term viability, the Chamber of Commerce called a public hearing to argue the merits of an alternate route closer to town. Prominent residents took turns elaborating on the town’s highway dependability. The meeting resembled a well-rehearsed courtroom drama with more than 20 different testimonies that went well into the night. Chamber president Harry Pippin served as mediator, keeping peace and order. If the road moved so that highway traffic could not see businesses, and the services they offer, insurance agent Philip Bowles argued, “…then these businesses have just about as much chance as the gentleman who winked at the blond in the dark.” It was doubtful new businesses would move in to replace the ones that could not continue before them. “Therefore we feel that the very existence of the town depends on the future location of Highway 6,” Bowles said. Due to the frequency of blizzards across the plains at the time, Keenesburg quickly became more than just a pit stop for passersby, however. Convenient access and the presence of a medical clinic made the town a safe haven for stranded travelers. These benefits represented a reasonable argument for the road to be located near Keenesburg instead of bypassing it entirely, attorney David Miller said. “Human life I think is more important, both economically and in its existence, than simply a road users’ benefit measure,” said Miller. Sometime following the public hearing, the state highway department elected to build near Keenesburg. The aggressive approach those early leaders took potentially saved the town. In the late 1950s, the Chamber of Commerce placed a now famous sign at the entrance to Keenesburg reading, “Home of 500 happy people and a few soreheads.” Though the sign has since been replaced, the wording remains the same, even though the population is incorrect. More than 1,200 people (and perhaps a few more soreheads) will celebrate Keenesburg’s 100th anniversary this summer. Had the highway been built bypassing the town, it might more closely resemble a ghost town than the small rural community it is today. Colorado Coal Pioneers In the years following Colorado’s famous gold rush, coal mining became the most significant industry in the state. Hard metal mining in the mountains revitalized the northern coalfields, which produced much of the state’s coal. When New York native Henry Briggs established the first commercial coal mine in Coal Park, present-day Erie, the area was already known for its rich coal deposits. A few scattered farmers were initially responsible for settling near Coal Park, connected only by a lonely stagecoach route traveling from Denver to Laramie each day. Surface coal at the time was plentiful, and early farmers made good use of it. A few ambitious individuals even earned extra money gathering surface coal and delivering it by wagon. In 1859, Jim Baker dug the area’s first coal mine, although credit is often given to Ira Austin. Austin dug a coal mine in 1866 on land east of Erie that he had acquired from George Gilson, who didn’t feel coal mining would be lucrative without access to a railroad. Around the time of Austin’s mine, Reverend Richard Van Valkenburg also settled in the area. Fresh off serving in the Civil War, Van Valkenburg had relocated to Colorado to regain his health while working in the mountain metal mines near Central City. Van Valkenburg knew Colorado and Wyoming well, having spent time as circuit rider in the war. Circuit riders were traveling ministers who would preach sermons from town to town where there was no local church. While living in New York, he married Cordelia Briggs, a relative of Henry Briggs. Like many following the coal mines, Henry Briggs saw the sound investment in Erie, and filed for 160 acres on the east side of town. In 1871, operations at the Briggs Mine began, and for many years the mine produced roughly 70 percent of the area’s coal. Together, Van Valkenburg, Briggs and a few other prominent residents platted the town and renamed it Erie, after the Pennsylvania city. The discovery of coal and establishment of a prominent mine attracted a spur from the Union Pacific railroad later in 1871. Soon, several more mines were filed, and the area grew rapidly. Mining tunnels stretched for miles, often connected to each other. In poor weather, people would sometimes walk in the protected underground system to get from one place to another. Erie became Colorado’s most important coal town at the time. For several decades, the northern coalfields continued to produce coal at a high rate until the demand began to diminish in the 1940s. In 1978, one of the last operating mines in the Erie area, the Eagle Mine, discontinued operations. A year later, the Lincoln Mine closed, ending a 100-year industry in the area. The remnants of Erie’s past still exist today deep beneath the bustling town, shuttered and off limits. The Carbon Valley Communities In the early parts of the 1870s, coal mining had already taken flight in the northeast coal fields from Marshall to Erie. The success of the Briggs Mine and the commodity of coal attracted more miners, who staked their personal claims to land throughout the area and opened new mines. As miners followed the coal seam father northeast, new communities began to form to capitalize on the lucrative resource. The final few communities established along the far end of the prosperous coal veins were Firestone, Frederick and Dacono, also known as the Tri-Town or Carbon Valley area. In the early part of the 1860s, William and Tom McKissick were members of a voluntary militia organization at Fort Junction north of present-day Firestone. The sod fort was constructed during the Colorado War to protect early settlers from Native American attacks. The Colorado War was fought between the allied tribes of Cheyenne and Arapaho nations and white settlers and militia. While settlers were investing in coal mining a few miles away in Erie and Marshall, early settlers to the Tri-Town area recounted it as nothing more than plains, woods and wild animals. A few years following the Colorado War, though, the McKissick brothers discovered coal near the fort, and established one of the earliest mines in state history in 1872. Soon three different mining camps emerged. The area’s first major mine was the Baum near present-day Frederick and named for Charles Lockhart Baum, president of Consolidated Coal & Coke. Baum is credited with opening the Weld County coal fields and establishing the mining camp later known as Dacono. Baum named the new community after three influential women in his life – one of them being his wife, Daisy – although his relationship with the other two – Nora and Cora – is still subject to conflicting reports. Frederick and Firestone were also founded around the same time. Although the three new communities were located near each other and had the same principle industry, there was a desire for each to remain distinct. When Frederick A. Clark’s daughters filed for incorporation of the town named for their father, Dacono and Firestone quickly followed. Between December 1907 and January 1908, all three had filed for incorporation, only days apart. Farming was not a significant force in settling much of the Carbon Valley area. New settlers were often single men or men who had come to investigate the area before bringing their families. To accommodate these hopeful miners, each town set up boarding houses and hotels. The towns also attracted miners from the southern coal fields, who came to seek more stable job opportunities. Farms that operated near Carbon Valley offered extra job opportunities when weather or demand impacted coal production. As farming progressed, the Frederick elevator was able to provide farmers somewhere to buy supplies and market their products. Despite the growth of farming, coal mining remained the area’s central product. Early coal mining was a dangerous job. The threat of explosions, cave-ins and black lung were ever present. Miners were often also expected to provide their own equipment. Charles W. Smith, then president of Consolidated Coal & Coke, saw need for a new innovative machine that would revolutionize coal mining. The new machine, called the Continuous Miner, would mine coal vertically from the face to the pit car in one operation, and was first tested in the Baum Mine before the patent was sold to Joy Manufacturing to be marketed and distributed across the country. Despite having only a small fraction of Colorado’s coal mines, Weld County produced nearly 25 percent of all coal mined in the state. Like Erie, coal production continued until demand began to diminish in the 1940s and most mines began to close. While the legacy remains, the stories have grown vague with time. But there is one certainty you can find in their history, Eleanor Ayer said in her historical compilation of Carbon Valley, Green Light on the Tipple. “The most certain fact concerning the settlement of the Tri-Towns is this: for every story told about the history, you can find someone with a slightly different version,” wrote Ayer. A Sugared Past Sugar beets have a long history in Colorado. In the late 1800s, a research study at what is now Colorado State University discovered the region was environmentally suited for sugar beet farming, paving the way for an economic movement that would sweep across parts of eastern Colorado for decades. Great Western Sugar Company established its first processing plant in Loveland in 1901 and a showcase plant in Brighton years later, but history was made in Johnstown. Johnstown, platted in 1902 by Harvey Jay Perish in anticipation of a railroad hub, and Milliken began recruiting the sugar giant to build a factory between the two towns in 1910. Since Great Western and rival Holly Sugar both owned land nearby, the area was a natural fit for either company. In May 1920, after nearly a decade of discussion, Great Western finally announced Johnstown would receive its plant. Local banker W.E. Letford is credited with stepping in to facilitate discussions in 1917. The announcement came amid a worldwide sugar shortage, driving up prices. In the months following the announcement, growth boomed in Johnstown. At least seventeen businesses and homes were in various stages of construction, including a new hotel and bungalows for factory workers. The town doubled the size of its reservoir and approved funding for a new middle school and high school. Then, suddenly, the bottom fell out. Just months into construction, the sugar market collapsed, halting work on the Johnstown factory. The stoppage impacted the whole town, as construction of new homes also ground to a painful halt. To make matters worse, existing factories were running into another problem. Processing beets yielded a fair amount of discard molasses, and factories were unsure of how to dispose of it. Since this molasses still contained a high percentage of valuable sugar, chemists were determined to find a solution for how to extract it. After years of experimentation, Great Western felt it was ready to build a refinery to extract this sugar. Great Western announced this factory for Johnstown. When it finally opened in 1926, it was the only one in the world to successfully use a barium-process to manufacture refined granulated sugar from formerly worthless discard molasses. The factory quickly gained worldwide attention as the only successful refinery to utilize the new process. Two others had made the attempt, but both had closed by 1927. The new factory reinvigorated Johnstown’s hope for its future. As production increased, so too did beautification of the town. Parks and fountains could be seen around town, more homes were built and a large elementary school was constructed. Over the next 30 years, Great Western made multiple world-shattering announcements, adding to Johnstown’s historic and iconic factory, including two new products (soft brown sugar and confectioners powdered sugar) and the construction of a new processing plant for MSG, which gained worldwide popularity in the 1950s. Although neither of these factories exist in Johnstown today, they stand as a historic reminder that even the smallest towns can make history. Highlandlake Heritage Like many towns in the eastern plains north of Denver, Mead began when a railroad was announced for the area. In 1905, Great Western Railroad made plans to build a railroad station and sugar beet dump on the eastern side of Paul Mead’s farm in what was then known as the Highlandlake District. The location of the railroad, however, would bypass an already prosperous community by nearly two miles. Years earlier in 1871, Lorin Mead noticed a singular depression in the land while on a stagecoach bound for Greeley from Longmont. An antelope was drinking out of the spring pothole, paying no attention to the passing stagecoach. Several months later, Lorin staked his claim on the land, and began building Highlandlake. The land in those early years was semiarid. Many farmers felt the land was uncultivable, but Lorin thought his spring would be enough for his needs. A severe drought in 1873 quickly changed his mind, and he began work on the Highland Ditch, a 25-mile irrigation ditch from Lyons. As the story goes, with 19 miles left to complete on the ditch, Lorin resolved to finish in one day. The local paper picked up the story, but no one knows whether it is true. The completion of the ditch provided additional water storage and irrigation for the land, and the area began to boom. Highlandlake quickly became a popular camping location for people from as far away as Colorado Springs. The lake offered several family friendly activities and a view of the Rocky Mountains away from the city. As the area continued to boom, the need for a physician also increased, and Lorin reached out to his brother, Dr. Martin Mead, extolling the virtues of the area. In 1883, Martin and his family moved to Highlandlake from Cleveland, including a young son named Paul. By the early 1900s, sugar beets had become the cash crop of the area. Great Western Sugar Company would operate as many as 13 processing plants across the northeastern plains. Paul was working his father’s farm east of Highlandlake when the Great Western Railroad announced the new line near his farm. Before the first track was laid, Paul had plotted out the lots and streets for a new town, including lots for both a park and a school, and named it after his father. By the time Paul traveled to Greeley to file his new town in 1906, he had already sold 75 lots. In only a few years’ time, most of Highlandlake had moved over to the new town of Mead. Although much of the community moved, the values remained. Paul, a strong supporter of the Women’s Christian Temperance Movement, endorsed women’s suffrage and prohibition against alcohol. Many early plot deeds included a clause prohibiting the possession or use of alcohol. The community that composed Highlandlake and Mead also elected the state’s first all women school board in 1895, years ahead of Denver. Today, the only public building that remains in the once thriving Highlandlake community is the Historic Highlandlake Church, built in 1896. The church gained notoriety in the 1990s when it became a set for Bruce Willis’ film Die Hard II. Finding Refuge on the Prairie At the heart of Commerce City is a piece of American history so significant, it’s impossible to tell the city’s story without it. The Rocky Mountain Arsenal was established in 1942 on 30-square miles northeast of Denver following the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. Like many small communities along the South Platte River east of Denver, Commerce City had humble beginnings in agriculture as early as the mid-1800s. Though the land had ample access to water resources, there were few trees and no lakes or reservoirs. Through hard work, homesteaders created an area full of successful farms and ranches. Throughout the early 1900s, the area was devoted to wheat fields, dairies and pig farms. Railroads built along the river would later attract large industrial development, and the first refinery was built in the 1930s. At that time, the area was made up of several small neighborhoods, including Adams City, Irondale and Dupont (which would merge to become Commerce Town in 1952). More than 200 families occupied the land east of the city that would encompass the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. Japan’s attack thrust the country into World War II, and the United States needed a secure place to develop physical and chemical weapons. The area near Denver was selected because it was far from coastlines and sheltered from enemy aircraft by the Rocky Mountains. It also offered access to major railroads and a large workforce, as well as plenty of water and power supplies. Although not all shared the sentiment, many farmers viewed it as their patriotic duty to surrender land to help win the war. The United States Army would occupy the land until the war’s end, when it was leased to Shell Oil Company. Through 1985, Shell used the land to develop agricultural chemicals. The manufacturing process resulted in unintended contamination of the soil and water in and outside the arsenal. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service got involved when a contractor discovered endangered bald eagles roosting on the contaminated site in 1986. However, it was Jean Klein, then president of South Adams County Water and Sanitation, who initiated the push to clean and preserve the area, with support from Commerce City, Tri-County Health, the Environmental Protection Agency and a host of other oversight groups. Although outside interest groups made an effort to oppose funding for the cleanup, the residents of Commerce City, who had fully embraced the arsenal and its history, were successful in getting it declared a national Superfund site and eventually reopened as the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge. Today, the Rocky Mountain Arsenal is one of the world’s most successful urban wildlife refuges, welcoming more than 350,000 visitors annually and housing more than 330 species of wildlife, including raptors, migrating songbirds, bison, deer, and the recently introduced endangered black-footed ferret. Had it not been for the efforts of the early homesteaders to develop the land suitable for farming and raising a family, it’s unlikely the land would have become as welcoming for wildlife as it is today. Nearly 100 years later, their legacies live on both as a piece of history and a refuge for the area’s precious wildlife. “I call it the miracle on the prairie,” said Reba Droter, who was actively involved in the cleanup and establishment of the refuge. “It’s a little piece of untouched land where you can see the beauty of the prairie and the mountains just as the settlers did. If it hadn’t been for the arsenal, this land would be industrialized Denver, and the beauty would be lost.”